Are small boobs okay here? General consensus

[Rocko4769]

It's been explained to me that the purpose of this forum is just tits in general, regardless of size.

But it would seem that what this forum has turned into is a fetish forum catering to huge breasts.

That being said, I've been seeing a MASSIVE increase of new members posting in every subforum women with B cups or less, and that's confusing to me because...why post someone with no noteable tits on a forum about tits?

 

[Plankton]

It's been explained to me that the purpose of this forum is just tits in general, regardless of size.

But it would seem that what this forum has turned into is a fetish forum catering to huge breasts.

That being said, I've been seeing a MASSIVE increase of new members posting in every subforum women with B cups or less, and that's confusing to me because...why post someone with no noteable tits on a forum about tits?

I didn't vote for any of the provided options because my preference would be "E) Sure small are ok, but with that noted in the thread title so people don't "waste" their time if not interested". More info is better, afterall. 🙂

 

[drumbass]

This is a dorum about tits, specificly tits in tops. That said ther are many tits not in tops here 🙂. I dont really care if people post big tits, small tits etc. Find the tits you like and enjoy it.

I find the best policy here , even if I dont always follow it lol, is if you dont like something move on to the next one. That said im not sure ive seen a massive influx of small boobs here, but then again like i said skip over what you dontl like.

 

[Rocko4769]

I didn't vote for any of the provided options because my preference would be "E) Sure small are ok, but with that noted in the thread title so people don't "waste" their time if not interested". More info is better, afterall. 🙂

Poll edited to include that option!

 

[BQretired]

As mentioned back in November 2006, Thread 'Rule: Big boobs only?' https://titsintops.com/phpBB2/index.php?threads/rule-big-boobs-only.1206/ , this is a Tits in Tops Forum. So, technically, any girl with boobs qualifies.

But, the majority of members prefer big boobs. And, for many, the bigger the better.

Staff is trying to catch, and lable threads accordingly (Small Boober, Borderline Boober, or Moderate Boober). But, like "Massive" and "Huge" these can be a bit subjective.

 

[Boobsnation]

I didn't vote for any of the provided options because my preference would be "E) Sure small are ok, but with that noted in the thread title so people don't "waste" their time if not interested". More info is better, afterall. 🙂

I agree with your opinion, so much so that I vote for the option you suggested, but I think that in addition to the description of sizes, I think it would also be nice if described whether the breasts are natural or silicone, I particularly prefer natural breasts, and there is nothing more frustrating than seeing a title "milf with huge tits" for example, and when I enter the topic drooling I come across a plastic doll with 2 basketballs in place of tits, each one has their preferences and I respect the preference of all, but it would be great if it already had in the title that the breasts are made of silicone. I myself sin in this sense, because I prefer natural breasts and practically don't even see artificial breasts, I end up forgetting to put this description in my publications, but I'll try to remember to put it in my next publications so that no one gets frustrated when see a post of mine, just as I get frustrated when I see silicone breasts, I'm sure many get frustrated seeing natural breasts, and it's very annoying haha

 

[iron_chef_sanji]

I’m against posts about small tits women even if labelled, because that clogs the board for a casual user just browsing a subforum.

It also runs the risk of turning this place into a generic “porn” board, which is useless to most of us.

 

[Bobby Baccala]

I’m against posts about small tits women even if labelled, because that clogs the board for a casual user just browsing a subforum.

It also runs the risk of turning this place into a generic “porn” board, which is useless to most of us.

I totally agree, I don't want to get into titsintops and pass the time looking for big tits like in most tube sites where there are many flat chested women vids tagged as enormous tits. It's a waste of time.

 

[eric69]

There are a million general porn forums out there. I feel that this one should concentrate on sizeable tits in tops.

I'd be in favour of there being a sub-forum for small and medium sized tits that I can then totally ignore. I wouldn't want to see 20 new posts in say, Bust Amateurs or whatever, and 19 of these are small chested.

 

[erihp]

I’m against posts about small tits women even if labelled, because that clogs the board for a casual user just browsing a subforum.

It also runs the risk of turning this place into a generic “porn” board, which is useless to most of us.

But the brand is ‘Tits in Tops’, not ‘Only D+ Tits in Tops’.

I think any ‘risk’ you’re talking about is not real. The mods do (too good) of a job getting rid of stuff that isn’t related.

If you really were fighting this sort of crusade, I’d think you’d complain about the Asses sub forum before small Tits in Tops.

There are a million general porn forums out there. I feel that this one should concentrate on sizeable tits in tops.

I'd be in favour of there being a sub-forum for small and medium sized tits that I can then totally ignore. I wouldn't want to see 20 new posts in say, Bust Amateurs or whatever, and 19 of these are small chested.

Fair point for it’s own sub forum, I quite like seeing women in Tops braless, and often it’s small perky boobs that do that most often.

Look Eric, they all can’t have boobs like your lady!!! Amazing BTW!

I totally agree, I don't want to get into titsintops and pass the time looking for big tits like in most tube sites where there are many flat chested women vids tagged as enormous tits. It's a waste of time.

Bad tagging is a separate problem, I agree, too many posters think ‘huge’ is a 36D lol

 

[TKwr900]

Make a Fried Eggs sub-section for anything below a K cup.

 

[tedbell2000]

It's been explained to me that the purpose of this forum is just tits in general, regardless of size.

But it would seem that what this forum has turned into is a fetish forum catering to huge breasts.

That being said, I've been seeing a MASSIVE increase of new members posting in every subforum women with B cups or less, and that's confusing to me because...why post someone with no noteable tits on a forum about tits?

Small breasts aren't breasts, they are an insult.

Please don't insult the people here with anything less than a DD-cup.

 

[huambrillo]

My .02 - I would just rather see big ones. For example, on the candids section, I see some guys posting "catches" of any woman they or I would see on the street. Do we need that? (after all it's bandwidth/storage)

 

[erihp]

My .02 - I would just rather see big ones. For example, on the candids section, I see some guys posting "catches" of any woman they or I would see on the street. Do we need that? (after all it's bandwidth/storage)

Your .02 is worth more than anyone elses.

One of the high quality and truely huge boobed candid capturers ever! You are a legend sir. Thanks for having a thread where every time you post its a home run with the bases fully loaded.

 

[NandoBBLover]

First and Last options. Voted for the last, I woke up today a bit more democratic than usual.

 

[KarlosChaos]

Poll edited to include that option!

So how do I change my vote now that's been added. I voted for option 1 at first but now that new option is available I'd have gone with that instead, nothing really against the smaller size but that's not why I visit this forum so I'd like to skip the bee stings where possible.

 

[Rocko4769]

I’m against posts about small tits women even if labelled, because that clogs the board for a casual user just browsing a subforum.

It also runs the risk of turning this place into a generic “porn” board, which is useless to most of us.

This is my biggest issue

 

[ltdshred]

I really dislike fake tits. I would rather have small natural tits over fake tits.

 

[AreolaGrande]

My .02 - I would just rather see big ones. For example, on the candids section, I see some guys posting "catches" of any woman they or I would see on the street. Do we need that? (after all it's bandwidth/storage)

I agree with almost everything stated in this thread so far, but this especially grinds my gears a bit. It happens in the candid "huge butts" threads too, and in general a lot of the smaller A-DD cups that get posted all over the place on the forum present the same issue.

It's not that I think it should be shamed or against the rules to post small/medium boobs, but I come back to the question "Do we really need that?", when the "Big Tits" section of any porn site is brimming with C cups, D cups and DD cups, and you have to legit sometimes search "Macromastia" to get a girl (rarely actually with true clinical macromastia) who's anywhere close to the size of even my own current longtime partner. Even querying "Huge" still gives you like lots of silicone tits as well as DD, DDD and maaaaaybe some Gs on mainstream sites.

Especially an issue in the candid forum as you mentioned, because some of the kinds of tits in tops people post there... most of us would be able to see hundreds of with a 5-10 minute drive into town, on top of probably dozens of bigger, better tits in tops in the same trip. It's been occurring a lot on one very active candid butts/bootys thread I follow, in which lots of comment proclaim an ass is "big" or even "huge" when it's maybe just slightly fatter or perkier than a mostly flat/thin ass.

I really like the idea of having those threads labeled something like "SMALL/AVG ♦ [Name or descriptor of girl]" in the same way that threads get labeled "BBW4U ♦ Madeline S.". I think in general, more labeling is better than less, and it could even be implemented as a general rule/courtesy to do so, since I have sometimes had my own original threads to include those labels for FFW and BBW, when the girl may not even have really fit that descriptor IMHO haha. Seems like it'd make more sense to have a push for SMALL/AVG boobs to be labeled as such.

I don't think having a whole separate sub-forum would work well. I mulled the idea over, but it would just get too messy the more I think about it.

I really dislike fake tits. I would rather have small natural tits over fake tits.

I think this might be the wrong thread to discuss it, but do you mean specifically "silicone implants" when you refer to "fake tits". I also dislike the look and feel of silicone implants, but I think with improved elective medical technologies for fat transfer, that there have been a number of impressively natural looking "augmented/fake" tits via the fat transfer method that look and probably feel real.

 

[BQretired]

...Bad tagging is a separate problem, I agree, too many posters think ‘huge’ is a 36D lol

Indeed it was. And, that's why we disable the #tag system, as it wasn't being used uniformly, or, imo, correctly.