You are knocking it out of the park with these larger breast sizes......
Anybody want to join me in the hot tub? .......great proportioning...
Yeah, you just input the W and H sizes via sliders. So, basically, you want me to produce 1080X1920 images, right? Now they're 1024x1536.How do you choose the pixel ratio for the image size? Can you make images at 9:16 for better view in a cellphone if you want?
Hello, not necessarily. You could do 720 x 1600 (ratio 9:20) pixels if this is something you want. It is less pixels than your current size I think. I have lots of portrait images on my cellphone and sometimes I like to watch them as a random slideshow. I discovered last year that it can be a very interesting naughty "game" when I am horny! I can suggest this game to everyone, lol!Yeah, you just input the W and H sizes via sliders. So, basically, you want me to produce 1080X1920 images, right? Now they're 1024x1536.
EDIT: just tried, no way. I go over my GPU memory limit (12GB) so I go from about 1 min and a few secs per image, to nearly 15 min per image. I simply won't do that
Imagine the reaction from those at the costume party when she showed up..... She gives pendulous new meaning....Great work partnerBeware of the bitc... I mean... witches!!!
Yeah, definitely less pixels. I'm at <40 secs per image with this format.Hello, not necessarily. You could do 720 x 1600 (ratio 9:20) pixels if this is something you want. It is less pixels than your current size I think. I have lots of portrait images on my cellphone and sometimes I like to watch them as a random slideshow. I discovered last year that it can be a very interesting naughty "game" when I am horny! I can suggest this game to everyone, lol!
PS I gave you the wrong ratio in my previous message, I meant to write 9:20.
Yeah, just do what you prefer. I would do it this way because I would prefer to add them to my collection of portrait images. I just like watching them on my phone.Yeah, definitely less pixels. I'm at <40 secs per image with this format.
I think I still prefer 2:3 for composition reasons, but this is not that bad.
Here are some quick and dirty samples:
Here are some direct comparisons between the "original" format and the one you suggested.Yeah, just do what you prefer. I would do it this way because I would prefer to add them to my collection of portrait images. I just like watching them on my phone.
Here are some direct comparisons between the "original" format and the one you suggested.
OFC I used the same exact prompt between each couple of pics, changing only the resolution.
SD 1.5 models have a base resolution of 512x512. In order to get the most out of them, one should render his pics in multiples of that base res. That's why I use 512x768 as a base res, using hires fix to upscale 2X to 1024x1536.
You can't beat this stuff "full figured & bulging excessively in all the right places...."Misc BBW matures, feat. RT Amateurs:
WOWI will also post some mixes between some RT variations. The following pics are achieved using a mix of RT Dreams and RT Amateurs.
I think this is the most aesthetically pleasing combination I came with yet.