BBW Matures - Photorealistic and digital painting style (my work)

How do you choose the pixel ratio for the image size? Can you make images at 9:16 for better view in a cellphone if you want?
 
How do you choose the pixel ratio for the image size? Can you make images at 9:16 for better view in a cellphone if you want?
Yeah, you just input the W and H sizes via sliders. So, basically, you want me to produce 1080X1920 images, right? Now they're 1024x1536.

EDIT: just tried, no way. I go over my GPU memory limit (12GB) so I go from about 1 min and a few secs per image, to nearly 15 min per image. I simply won't do that :D
 
Last edited:
Beware of the bitc... I mean... witches!!!
 

Attachments

  • 00000-3494651847.png
    00000-3494651847.png
    2 MB · Views: 41
  • 00001-3325908761.png
    00001-3325908761.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 34
  • 00002-1531729266.png
    00002-1531729266.png
    2 MB · Views: 32
  • 00003-3980064703.png
    00003-3980064703.png
    2 MB · Views: 35
  • 00004-3156517535.png
    00004-3156517535.png
    2 MB · Views: 33
  • 00005-697416292.png
    00005-697416292.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 36
  • 00006-2712090894.png
    00006-2712090894.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 34
  • 00007-4150017492.png
    00007-4150017492.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 29
  • 00008-762692477.png
    00008-762692477.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 26
  • 00009-2496239024.png
    00009-2496239024.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 37
I decide to give a proper name to my combination of RT Dreams and RT Amateurs, naming it RT Lucid Dreams (wow, what an original name...).
So... voluptuous superheroines feat. RT Lucid Dreams:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-3918413328.png
    00000-3918413328.png
    2 MB · Views: 12
  • 00001-1629029693.png
    00001-1629029693.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 12
  • 00002-1393750971.png
    00002-1393750971.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 11
  • 00003-851395435.png
    00003-851395435.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 10
  • 00004-2941308045.png
    00004-2941308045.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 13
  • 00005-2563325197.png
    00005-2563325197.png
    2 MB · Views: 11
  • 00006-4270834217.png
    00006-4270834217.png
    2 MB · Views: 12
  • 00008-723416308.png
    00008-723416308.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 12
  • 00007-965412123.png
    00007-965412123.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 12
  • 00009-1439412141.png
    00009-1439412141.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 13
Busty mature waitresses feat. RT Lucid Dreams (RTLD).
You all are getting hungry, arent'you huh?
 

Attachments

  • 00000-357319389.png
    00000-357319389.png
    2 MB · Views: 54
  • 00001-2964739711.png
    00001-2964739711.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 40
  • 00002-1072388270.png
    00002-1072388270.png
    2 MB · Views: 36
  • 00003-378241081.png
    00003-378241081.png
    2 MB · Views: 37
  • 00004-2605085569.png
    00004-2605085569.png
    2 MB · Views: 34
  • 00005-3341238417.png
    00005-3341238417.png
    2 MB · Views: 35
  • 00006-3563170548.png
    00006-3563170548.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 30
  • 00007-481275479.png
    00007-481275479.png
    2 MB · Views: 34
  • 00009-3888212505.png
    00009-3888212505.png
    2 MB · Views: 38
  • 00008-3532978357.png
    00008-3532978357.png
    2 MB · Views: 50
Yeah, you just input the W and H sizes via sliders. So, basically, you want me to produce 1080X1920 images, right? Now they're 1024x1536.

EDIT: just tried, no way. I go over my GPU memory limit (12GB) so I go from about 1 min and a few secs per image, to nearly 15 min per image. I simply won't do that :D
Hello, not necessarily. You could do 720 x 1600 (ratio 9:20) pixels if this is something you want. It is less pixels than your current size I think. I have lots of portrait images on my cellphone and sometimes I like to watch them as a random slideshow. I discovered last year that it can be a very interesting naughty "game" when I am horny! I can suggest this game to everyone, lol! :LOL:

PS I gave you the wrong ratio in my previous message, I meant to write 9:20.
 
BBW grannies in the street, feat. RTLD:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-2085989439.png
    00000-2085989439.png
    2 MB · Views: 59
  • 00001-2307890169.png
    00001-2307890169.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 55
  • 00002-3516953320.png
    00002-3516953320.png
    2 MB · Views: 48
  • 00003-4076185383.png
    00003-4076185383.png
    2 MB · Views: 48
  • 00004-352017453.png
    00004-352017453.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 53
  • 00005-1344709481.png
    00005-1344709481.png
    2 MB · Views: 49
  • 00006-2608368422.png
    00006-2608368422.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 43
  • 00007-1215625135.png
    00007-1215625135.png
    2 MB · Views: 44
  • 00008-1913543819.png
    00008-1913543819.png
    2 MB · Views: 49
  • 00009-1627122059.png
    00009-1627122059.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 58
Grannywatching at the mall, feat. RTLD:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-117784455.png
    00000-117784455.png
    2 MB · Views: 36
  • 00001-2081463471.png
    00001-2081463471.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 40
  • 00002-2891881892.png
    00002-2891881892.png
    2 MB · Views: 36
  • 00003-1598421986.png
    00003-1598421986.png
    2 MB · Views: 31
  • 00004-82000402.png
    00004-82000402.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 36
  • 00005-2673357557.png
    00005-2673357557.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 35
  • 00006-561215193.png
    00006-561215193.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 40
  • 00007-4131119953.png
    00007-4131119953.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 37
  • 00008-3528225241.png
    00008-3528225241.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 28
  • 00009-3110581735.png
    00009-3110581735.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 37
Hello, not necessarily. You could do 720 x 1600 (ratio 9:20) pixels if this is something you want. It is less pixels than your current size I think. I have lots of portrait images on my cellphone and sometimes I like to watch them as a random slideshow. I discovered last year that it can be a very interesting naughty "game" when I am horny! I can suggest this game to everyone, lol! :LOL:

PS I gave you the wrong ratio in my previous message, I meant to write 9:20.
Yeah, definitely less pixels. I'm at <40 secs per image with this format.
I think I still prefer 2:3 for composition reasons, but this is not that bad.
Here are some quick and dirty samples:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-2251200956.png
    00000-2251200956.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 64
  • 00001-4222835534.png
    00001-4222835534.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 70
  • 00002-2642707218.png
    00002-2642707218.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 74
  • 00003-148153222.png
    00003-148153222.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 69
  • 00004-1394207461.png
    00004-1394207461.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 63
  • 00005-2039825415.png
    00005-2039825415.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 59
  • 00006-3754386334.png
    00006-3754386334.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 60
  • 00007-102142604.png
    00007-102142604.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 56
  • 00008-3686197391.png
    00008-3686197391.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 57
  • 00009-1102503476.png
    00009-1102503476.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 64
Yeah, definitely less pixels. I'm at <40 secs per image with this format.
I think I still prefer 2:3 for composition reasons, but this is not that bad.
Here are some quick and dirty samples:
Yeah, just do what you prefer. I would do it this way because I would prefer to add them to my collection of portrait images. I just like watching them on my phone.
 
Yeah, just do what you prefer. I would do it this way because I would prefer to add them to my collection of portrait images. I just like watching them on my phone.
Here are some direct comparisons between the "original" format and the one you suggested.
OFC I used the same exact prompt between each couple of pics, changing only the resolution.
SD 1.5 models have a base resolution of 512x512. In order to get the most out of them, one should render his pics in multiples of that base res. That's why I use 512x768 as a base res, using hires fix to upscale 2X to 1024x1536.
 

Attachments

  • 00010-632666827.png
    00010-632666827.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 98
  • 00009-632666827.png
    00009-632666827.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 92
  • 00008-63686502.png
    00008-63686502.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 94
  • 00007-63686502.png
    00007-63686502.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 83
  • 00006-1576315494.png
    00006-1576315494.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 75
  • 00005-1576315494.png
    00005-1576315494.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 66
  • 00004-4096107464.png
    00004-4096107464.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 62
  • 00003-4096107464.png
    00003-4096107464.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 68
  • 00002-4052397960.png
    00002-4052397960.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 83
  • 00001-4052397960.png
    00001-4052397960.png
    2 MB · Views: 97
Yes for computer monitors your ratio is much better. In any case, If I want to download any of your photos I can always crop them to my desired ratio. :)
 
Misc BBW matures, feat. RT Amateurs:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-3068694145.png
    00000-3068694145.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 45
  • 00001-2544532560.png
    00001-2544532560.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 39
  • 00002-2012640188.png
    00002-2012640188.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 38
  • 00003-974110831.png
    00003-974110831.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 41
  • 00004-897909287.png
    00004-897909287.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 39
  • 00005-4059965724.png
    00005-4059965724.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 49
  • 00007-654328879.png
    00007-654328879.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 47
  • 00006-2111306801.png
    00006-2111306801.png
    2 MB · Views: 47
  • 00008-283484123.png
    00008-283484123.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 46
  • 00009-1966844835.png
    00009-1966844835.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 47
Here are some direct comparisons between the "original" format and the one you suggested.
OFC I used the same exact prompt between each couple of pics, changing only the resolution.
SD 1.5 models have a base resolution of 512x512. In order to get the most out of them, one should render his pics in multiples of that base res. That's why I use 512x768 as a base res, using hires fix to upscale 2X to 1024x1536.
Misc BBW matures, feat. RT Amateurs:
You can't beat this stuff "full figured & bulging excessively in all the right places...."
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2024-04-01 at 3.52.55 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-04-01 at 3.52.55 PM.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 31
  • Screen Shot 2024-04-01 at 3.53.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-04-01 at 3.53.34 PM.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 30
Fantasy voluptuous queens, feat. RTLD:
 

Attachments

  • 00000-1781603086.png
    00000-1781603086.png
    2 MB · Views: 30
  • 00001-447134681.png
    00001-447134681.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 23
  • 00002-1352938670.png
    00002-1352938670.png
    2 MB · Views: 26
  • 00003-3674754279.png
    00003-3674754279.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 21
  • 00004-3289558172.png
    00004-3289558172.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 20
  • 00005-2409146417.png
    00005-2409146417.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 22
  • 00006-2690387094.png
    00006-2690387094.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 23
  • 00007-666564744.png
    00007-666564744.png
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • 00008-3882117604.png
    00008-3882117604.png
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • 00009-2220539399.png
    00009-2220539399.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 28
Fantasy BBW innerkeepers
 

Attachments

  • 00000-1805455115.png
    00000-1805455115.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 30
  • 00001-4280757580.png
    00001-4280757580.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 26
  • 00002-4142761280.png
    00002-4142761280.png
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • 00003-1546792597.png
    00003-1546792597.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 28
  • 00004-2796580470.png
    00004-2796580470.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 27
  • 00005-1123531040.png
    00005-1123531040.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 28
  • 00006-244278920.png
    00006-244278920.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 27
  • 00007-3095600137.png
    00007-3095600137.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 25
  • 00008-248791740.png
    00008-248791740.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 24
  • 00009-3866197285.png
    00009-3866197285.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 30
I will also post some mixes between some RT variations. The following pics are achieved using a mix of RT Dreams and RT Amateurs.
I think this is the most aesthetically pleasing combination I came with yet.
WOW
 
Top